Rainey v. Clark et al
Clark and Kristi Gray |
Rico Rayshon Rainey |
3:2022cv00053 |
February 2, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
Benjamin Beaton |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ORDER: The Court grants Petitioner's first application to proceed without prepayment of fees (DN #4 ) and denies as moot his second application (DN #7 ). cc: Plaintiff (pro se)(JM) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Petitioner Rico Rayshon Rainey (JM) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF FILING signature page by Rico Rayshon Rainey re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (JM) |
Filing 5 Letter from Plaintiff Rico Rayshon Rainey. (JM) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Petitioner Rico Rayshon Rainey. (JM) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Deficiency re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus.Reason for Deficiency: Filing Fee or Application to Proceed without Prepayment of Fee, Prison Trust Account statement. Failure to comply will be brought to the attention of the Court. Response due by 3/7/2022. (DeW) |
Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Judge Benjamin Beaton. (DeW) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus-Jefferson Circuit Court, filed by Rico Rayshon Rainey. (No Fee paid.) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit) (DeW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.