Mitchell v. Carhartt, Inc.
| Martha Mitchell |
| Carhartt, Inc. |
| Quest Diagnostics Clinical Laboratories, Inc. |
| Carhartt, Inc. |
| 4:2014cv00057 |
| May 30, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Owensboro Office |
| Hopkins |
| H. Brent Brennenstuhl |
| Joseph H. McKinley |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
91
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Signed by Chief Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr. on 12/7/2016 granting 86 Motion for Certificate of Appealability. The Court certifies that its Memorandum, Opinion and Order dated 11/2/2015, is a final and appealable order, and that there is no just reason to delay appellate review. cc: Counsel (JBM)
|
|
Filing
85
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Signed by Chief Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr. on 10/7/2016 denying 81 Motion for Summary Judgment. cc: Counsel (JBM)
|
|
Filing
66
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 43 Motion for Summary Judgment. Quest's Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. Carhartt's claim for common law indemnity is DISMISSED without prejudice. This matter is referred to the Magistrate to conduct a settlement conference. Signed by Chief Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr on 4/14/2016. cc: Counsel, HBB (CM)(JBM)
|
|
Filing
54
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 42 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Chief Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr on 11/2/2015. cc: Counsel(JBM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
