Nevitt v. Carhartt Inc.
| April Nevitt and Justin Nevitt |
| Carhartt, Inc. |
| 4:2018cv00126 |
| August 2, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Owensboro Office |
| Hopkins |
| H Brent Brennenstuhl |
| Joseph H McKinley |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER Signed by Magistrate Judge H. Brent Brennenstuhl on 9/19/2018 granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer: Defendant's answer/response to Complaint is due by 10/26/2018; Plaintiffs' Motion #8 for Discovery Prior to Rule 26(f) Conference is DENIED; No later than 10/15/2018, counsel for the parties shall conduct the meeting of parties required by Rule 26(f); No later than 10/29/2018, counsel for the parties shall file the tendered scheduling order with the Court through CM/ECF. cc: Counsel, ES (JM)
|
| Proceedings held before Magistrate Judge H. Brent Brennenstuhl: Telephone Conference held on 9/18/2018. (JM) |
| Filing 10 RESPONSE to Motion re #8 MOTION for Discovery Prior to Rule 26(f) Conference filed by Carhartt, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Owen, David) |
|
Filing 9
TEXT ORDER by Magistrate Judge H. Brent Brennenstuhl on 9/13/2018, re #6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint filed by Carhartt, Inc., and #8 MOTION for Discovery Prior to Rule 26(f) Conference filed by Justin Nevitt, April Nevitt. IT IS ORDERED a TELEPHONIC Motion Hearing is set for 9/18/2018 at 10:00 AM, CDT, before Magistrate Judge H. Brent Brennenstuhl. The Court will initiate the call. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached.cc: Counsel (KLL)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Discovery Prior to Rule 26(f) Conference by Plaintiffs April Nevitt, Justin Nevitt (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order ) (Foster, Mark) |
| Filing 7 RESPONSE to Motion re #6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint filed by April Nevitt, Justin Nevitt. (Foster, Mark) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Defendant Carhartt, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibit A - September 6 e-mail, #3 Proposed Order) (Owen, David) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by April Nevitt, Justin Nevitt. Carhartt, Inc. served on 8/22/2018, answer due 9/12/2018. (Foster, Mark) |
|
Filing 4
TEXT ORDER by Chief Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr. on 8/2/18: This action is hereby REFERRED to the Honorable H. BRENT BRENNENSTUHL, United States Magistrate Judge, for determination of non-dispositive matters pursuant to Title 28, U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A).Said Magistrate is empowered to conduct any hearings necessary for their resolution. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached.cc:counsel (DJT)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Carhartt, Inc.. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for printing and serving the attached issued summons(es). (DJT) |
| Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Chief Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr.. (DJT) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Carhartt, Inc. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0644-2688284, filed by April Nevitt, Justin Nevitt. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Consent of April Nevitt, #3 Exhibit Consent of Justin Nevitt) (DJT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
