J.M. et al v. Hatfield et al
J.M., Roger Evans, Patricia Evans and Michelle Vannoy |
Anna Brown, Lighthouse Casualty Company and Melissa D. Hatfield |
4:2019cv00183 |
December 12, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
H Brent Brennenstuhl |
Joseph H McKinley |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 REPLY to Response to Motion re #6 MOTION to Dismiss In Lieu of Answer filed by Lighthouse Casualty Company. (Bass, Elizabeth) |
|
NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #16 MOTION for Leave to Redact Document ; Error: Incorrect Event Type selected by Counsel; Correction: Clerk corrected incorrect information (DJT) |
Filing 16 MOTION for Leave to File Redacted Version of Document #10 filed by J.M.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit) (Holloway, Wendell) Modified docket text and Event Type on 1/15/2020 (DJT). |
Filing 15 NOTICE of Filing (CD with pictures) by Patricia Evans, Roger Evans, J.M., Michelle Vannoy re #10 Response to Motion. (DJT) |
|
Filing 13 Document incorrectly filed by counsel. Clerk has attached document to #10 . Modified on 1/8/2020 (EAS). |
Filing 12 Document incorrectly filed by counsel. Clerk has attached document to #10 . Modified on 1/8/2020 (EAS). |
Filing 11 Document incorrectly filed by counsel. Clerk has attached document to #10 . Modified on 1/8/2020 (EAS). |
Filing 10 RESPONSE to Motion re #6 MOTION to Dismiss In Lieu of Answer filed by J.M.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Holloway, Wendell) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/8/2020: #2 Memorandum in Support, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Proposed Order) (EAS). (Attachment 1 replaced on 1/15/2020) (DJT). |
NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #10 Response to Motion: Wrong event used; document should have been filed as an attachment rather than separate entry; attachment not properly described; signature block on proposed order; and minor name used in pleadings. (EAS) |
|
Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to File Redacted Version of Documents by Defendant Lighthouse Casualty Company (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Notice of Removal (Redacted), #2 Exhibit Cover Sheet (Redacted), #3 Exhibit Complaint (Redacted), #4 Exhibit Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal (Redacted), #5 Proposed Order Order Granting Defendant's Motion for Leave to File Redacted Version of Documents) (Bass, Elizabeth) |
|
Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss In Lieu of Answer by Defendant Lighthouse Casualty Company (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Proposed Order) (Bass, Elizabeth) |
Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Lighthouse Casualty Company. (Bass, Elizabeth) |
|
Filing 3 CLERK'S NOTICE OF REMOVAL LETTER sent to Hopkins Circuit Court re #1 Notice of Removal, (DJT) |
Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Senior Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr.. (DJT) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL [NO ANSWER FILED] by Lighthouse Casualty Company from Hopkins Circuit Court, case number 19-CI-00711. Filing fee $ 400; receipt number 0644-3003097, filed by Lighthouse Casualty Company. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit State Court Record, #3 Exhibit Notice of Removal) (DJT) (Main Document 1 replaced on 12/20/2019) (EAS). (Attachment 1 replaced on 12/20/2019) (EAS). (Attachment 2 replaced on 12/20/2019) (EAS). (Attachment 3 replaced on 12/20/2019) (EAS). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.