Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01608
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lundy et al v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
as 3:2020cv05282
Plaintiff:
Stacy McDaniel, Mose Edward Green, Jr., Vernita M. Simpson and others
Defendant:
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
J.M. et al v. Hatfield et al
as 4:2019cv00183
Plaintiff:
J.M., Roger Evans, Patricia Evans and others
Defendant:
Anna Brown, Lighthouse Casualty Company and Melissa D. Hatfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Evans v. United States of America
as 1:2018cv01093
Plaintiff:
Roger Evans
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: Motion for Return of Property
Worley v. City of Vancouver et al
as 3:2016cv05572
Plaintiff:
Mack E Worley
Defendant:
City of Vancouver , Troy Rawlins , Monica Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans et al v. Sofradim Production SAS
as 2:2015cv12609
Plaintiff:
Mildred Evans and Roger Evans, Sr.
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Evans v. Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2011dp22510
Plaintiff:
Roger Evans
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , Depuy Inc , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Evans v. Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv04869
Defendant:
DePuy Inc.,, Depuy International Limited, Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Roger Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
EVANS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv51322
Plaintiff:
ROGER EVANS
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Evans et al v. CTI Division 15 Inc.
as 2:2008cv00238
Plaintiff:
Brent Evans, Roger Evans and Blake Smith
Defendant:
CTI Division 15 Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
