Walters v. Motley
Petitioner: James Walters
Respondent: John Motley
Case Number: 5:2009cv00008
Filed: January 16, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
Office: Habeas Corpus (General) Office
County: Morgan
Presiding Judge: Thomas B. Russell
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 9, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 14 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION by Chief Judge Thomas B. Russell on 6/8/09: an appropriate order shall issuecc:counsel (KJS)
April 16, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER by Chief Judge Thomas B. Russell on 4/15/09: to Show Cause why petition should not be denied and his action dismissed; Show Cause Response due by 5/18/2009.cc:counsel (KJS)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Walters v. Motley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: James Walters
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: John Motley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?