Cases 1 - 10 of 202
James Walters v. Professional Labor Group, LLC
as 23-3346
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JAMES WALTERS and JAMES WALTERS, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellant:
PROFESSIONAL LABOR GROUP, LLC
Austin v. McHugh et al
as 2:2023cv14370
Plaintiff:
Robert Allen Austin
Defendant:
Elizabeth Rose McHugh and James Walter McCann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WALTERS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv24494
Plaintiff:
JAMES WALTERS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SAMFORD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv01537
Plaintiff:
JAMES WALTER SAMFORD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Austin v. Mullins et al
as 2:2023cv14182
Plaintiff:
Robert Allen Austin
Defendant:
Leatha Dawn Mullins and James Walter McCann
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Austin v. McHugh et al
as 2:2023cv14181
Plaintiff:
Robert Allen Austin
Defendant:
Elizabeth Rose McHugh and James Walter McCann
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
(PC) Allen v. State of California et al
as 1:2023cv00946
Plaintiff:
David Allen
Defendant:
State of California, California Department of State Hospitals, Gavin Newsom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALTERS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv08936
Plaintiff:
COREY JAMES WALTERS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Walters v. New Haven City of et al
as 1:2023cv00172
Plaintiff:
Andrew James Walters
Defendant:
New Haven City of, Jacob Niese, Tim Schweitzer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-10255
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
