Brock v. Martin et al
Plaintiff: Dominique J. Brock
Defendant: Harlan R. Martin, Kindred, Long, Unknown Apprehencion Officers and Danial R. Winsett
Case Number: 5:2015cv00083
Filed: April 7, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
Office: Paducah Office
County: Lyon
Presiding Judge: Thomas B. Russell
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 18, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 42 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 2/16/2016; re 18 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Long, Danial R. Winsett, Kindred, Unknown Apprehencion Officers, Harlan R. Martin ; a separate order shall issue.cc:counsel (KJA)
September 2, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell. On initial review of Plaintiff's complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, IT IS ORDERED that the following 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims shall proceed: the Eighth and Fourteent h Amendment claims regarding the February 5, 2015, incident against Defendants Kindred, Martin, Long, and the Three Unknown Apprehension Officers in their individual and official capacities; and the retaliation claims against Defendants Martin, Gibbs , Winsett, and Kindred in their individual capacity. The following state-law claims shall proceed against all Defendants for civil damages: excessive force; various negligence claims; assault and battery; intentional infliction of emotional distress; false arrest, imprisonment, and apprehension; and malicious prosecution. All other claims are DISMISSED. cc: Plaintiff, pro se; Defendants; Gen. Counsel, J&PSC (JLS)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brock v. Martin et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dominique J. Brock
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Harlan R. Martin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kindred
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Long
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Apprehencion Officers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Danial R. Winsett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?