Brock v. Martin et al
Dominique J. Brock |
Harlan R. Martin, Kindred, Long, Unknown Apprehencion Officers and Danial R. Winsett |
5:2015cv00083 |
April 7, 2015 |
US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
Paducah Office |
Lyon |
Thomas B. Russell |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 42 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 2/16/2016; re 18 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Long, Danial R. Winsett, Kindred, Unknown Apprehencion Officers, Harlan R. Martin ; a separate order shall issue.cc:counsel (KJA) |
Filing 11 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell. On initial review of Plaintiff's complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, IT IS ORDERED that the following 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims shall proceed: the Eighth and Fourteent h Amendment claims regarding the February 5, 2015, incident against Defendants Kindred, Martin, Long, and the Three Unknown Apprehension Officers in their individual and official capacities; and the retaliation claims against Defendants Martin, Gibbs , Winsett, and Kindred in their individual capacity. The following state-law claims shall proceed against all Defendants for civil damages: excessive force; various negligence claims; assault and battery; intentional infliction of emotional distress; false arrest, imprisonment, and apprehension; and malicious prosecution. All other claims are DISMISSED. cc: Plaintiff, pro se; Defendants; Gen. Counsel, J&PSC (JLS) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.