Hobson v. United States of America et al
Ronald Howard Hobson |
United States of America, US Department of Justice, US Department of Veterans Affairs, US Department of Agriculture, Social Security Administration, Commonwealth of Kentucky, Commonwealth of Kentucky Department of Veterans Affairs and Marshall County Kentucky |
5:2022cv00093 |
July 25, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
Benjamin Beaton |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 NOTICE of Deficiency re DN #1 Complaint. Reason for Deficiency: Failure to file IFP or pay Filing Fee. Failure to comply will be brought to the attention of the Court. Response due by 8/24/2022. (CDL) |
Filing 3 NOTICE ON SUMMONS re: DN #1 Complaint re: missing Summons. (CDL) |
Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Judge Benjamin Beaton. (CDL) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commonwealth of Kentucky, Commonwealth of Kentucky Department of Veterans Affairs, Marshall County Kentucky, Social Security Administration, US Department of Agriculture, US Department of Justice, and US Department of Veterans Affairs (No Filing Fee Paid), filed by Ronald Howard Hobson. (Attachments: #1 Fax Cover Page, #2 Attachment) (CDL) (Main Document 1 replaced on 7/25/2022) (CDL). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.