Mitchell et al v. McCracken County Jail Officers
| Cindy Mitchell, Michelle Bennett, Tabatha Bourgoin, Elizabeth Thomason, Angeline Flowers, Nancey Ali, Marissa Hicks, Misty Henderson, Amanda Baker, Kelsey Roach, Stacey Henderson, Dana Travis, Tabatha Arkuski and Nitosha Lofty |
| McCracken County Jail Officers |
| 5:2024cv00053 |
| March 28, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Joseph H McKinley |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE ON SUMMONS re #1 Complaint. (MNM) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Deficiency re #1 Complaint. Reason for Deficiency: Forms, Filing Fee or Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees, and Prison Trust Account Statement. Failure to comply will be brought to the attention of the Court. Response due by 4/29/2024. (MNM) |
| Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Senior Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr. (MNM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against McCracken County Jail Officers, filed by Nancey Ali, Stacey Henderson, Tabatha Bourgoin, Marissa Hicks, Amanda Baker, Dana Travis, Michelle Bennett, Nitosha Lofty, Misty Henderson, Elizabeth Thomason, Cindy Mitchell, Kelsey Roach, Tabatha Arkuski, and Angeline Flowers. (MNM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
