Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Mitchell et al v. McCracken County Jail Officers
as 5:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Cindy Mitchell, Michelle Bennett, Tabatha Bourgoin and others
Defendant:
McCracken County Jail Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Travis v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2018cv00282
Plaintiff:
Dana Travis
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Ortega, Deon Dixon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pardoll v. Coopervision, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00778
Plaintiff:
Miriam Pardoll and Dana Travis
Defendant:
Coopervision, Inc., Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Bausch + Lomb and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0015
In Re: Disposable Contact Lens Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2015md02626
Defendant:
ABB/Con-cise Optical Group, LLC, ABB Optical Group, 1-800-Contacts.Com and others
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Cristiano, Heather Butcher, Christian Miller and others
Interested Party:
Jeffrey Stetler, Benjamin W. Hewitt, Monika Pasek and others
In Re:
In Re: Disposable Contact Lens Antitrust Litigation and Evan A. Strassberg
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001
Pardoll v. Coopervision, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv21205
Plaintiff:
Miriam Pardoll and Dana Travis
Defendant:
Coopervision, Inc., Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Bausch & Lomb Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0015
Pardoll v. Coopervision, Inc. et al
as FLS/1:15-cv-21205
Plaintiff:
Miriam Pardoll and Dana Travis
Defendant:
Coopervision, Inc. , Alcon Laboratories, Inc. , Bausch & Lomb Inc. and others
Sims v. Walker, Jr. et al.,
as 1:2010cv05266
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Sims
Defendant:
Rogers E. Walker, Jr., Jesse Montogmery, Jr., L. Julion and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sims v. Walker et al
as 1:2008cv06126
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Sims
Defendant:
Roger E Walker, Jr, Terry McCann, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
