Martin v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
| Martin and Debra K. Martin |
| Janssen Research & Development LLC, Johnson & Johnson Company, Bayer Healthcare LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Bayer AG, Bayer HealthCare AG, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Corporation, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc. |
| 2:2017cv02448 |
| March 24, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| New Orleans Office |
| Out of State |
| Eldon E Fallon |
| Michael North |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2017. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
PRETRIAL ORDERS #1 - #31. Signed by Judge Eldon E. Fallon.(ADI)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bayer Pharma AG, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Janssen Research & Development LLC, Johnson & Johnson Company. (am) |
| Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Eldon E. Fallon and Magistrate Judge Michael North. (gk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 053L-6045565) filed by Debra K. Martin. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)Attorney Barrett Beasley added to party Debra K. Martin(pty:pla).(Beasley, Barrett) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
