Moore v. U.S. Postal Service et al
Plaintiff: Tamara Danielle Moore
Defendant: U.S. Postal Service, Juana Richardson and Shirley Clarke
Case Number: 2:2018cv12270
Filed: December 4, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
Presiding Judge: Barry W Ashe
Referring Judge: Karen Wells Roby
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12117
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed; U.S. Postal Service through U.S. Attorneys Office served on 1/4/2019, answer due 3/6/2019. (sa)
December 21, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Shirley Clarke, Juana Richardson, U.S. Postal Service, U.S. Attorney General, and U.S. Attorney Office. (Sent to Plaintiff via USPS w/ cc Pauper Order and Pauper Letter) (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)(mp) Modified on 12/21/2018 (mp).
December 21, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Clerk's Notice of LR 54.7 (mp)
December 21, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that the #4 Motion for Reconsideration re #3 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby on December 20, 2018. (mp) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/21/2018: #1 Pauper Letter) (mp).
December 13, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MOTION for Reconsideration of #3 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Tamara Danielle Moore. Motion(s) referred to Karen Wells Roby. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(jls)
December 10, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that the #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby on December 9, 2018. (mp)
December 4, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 2 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Tamara Danielle Moore. Motion(s) referred to Karen Wells Roby. (jeg)
December 4, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against U.S. Postal Service,Shirley Clarke, Juana Richardson filed by Tamara Danielle Moore. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons, #7 Summons)(jeg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Moore v. U.S. Postal Service et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. Postal Service
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Juana Richardson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Shirley Clarke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tamara Danielle Moore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?