Kaigler v. Instant Brands, Inc.
Latoya Kaigler |
Instant Brands, Inc. |
2:2020cv00887 |
March 13, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
Eldon E Fallon |
Janis van Meerveld |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ORDER GRANTING #6 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to Adam John Kress. Signed by Judge Eldon E. Fallon on 4/6/2020. (Attachments: #1 PHV Notice) (jeg) |
Filing 7 Correction of Docket Entry by Clerk re #6 First MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Fee previously paid). **The title of the attached proposed order should not include the word Proposed but only reflect Order on the actual document. Please follow this requirement on future pleadings.** (jeg) |
Filing 6 EXPARTE/CONSENT First MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Fee previously paid) by Latoya Kaigler. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Stating no Disciplinary proceedings or Criminal Charges, #2 Exhibit Cetificate of Good Standing - A, #3 Exhibit Cetificate of Good Standing - B, #4 Proposed Order, #5 Supplement EFile Consent)(Gertler, Louis) |
Filing 5 **DEFICIENT** EXPARTE/CONSENT First MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee $ 100 receipt number ALAEDC-8243255) by Latoya Kaigler. (Attachments: #1 Statement Certificate of Good Standing and Statement, #2 Proposed Order, #3 E-File Privileges)(Gertler, Louis) Modified on 4/2/2020 (jeg). |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Instant Brands, Inc. (jeg) |
Filing 3 Correction of Docket Entry by Clerk re #1 Complaint. ****Document lists counsel, Michael K. Johnson, Kenneth W. Pearson, and Adam J. Kress, for a party in this action who have not been admitted to practice in this court. Any party not appearing in proper person must be represented by a member of the bar of this court (L.R. 83.2.4). Please see Local Rule 83.2.2 for this courts Procedures for Admission and Local Rule 83.2.5 for Visiting Attorneys to appear and participate Pro Hac Vice. Any future filings which list attorneys not admitted pursuant to LR 83.2.2 or 83.2.5 will not be accepted and will be deemed deficient.** (jeg) |
Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Eldon E. Fallon and Magistrate Judge Janis van Meerveld. (cc) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ALAEDC-8215166) filed by Louis L Gertler. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Summons)Attorney Louis L. Gertler added to party Latoya Kaigler (pty:pla).(Gertler, Louis) Modified text/filers on 3/16/2020 (jeg). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Kaigler v. Instant Brands, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Latoya Kaigler | |
Represented By: | Louis L. Gertler |
Represented By: | Adam John Kress |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Instant Brands, Inc. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.