Weggman v. Barr et al
| Charles H. Weggman, III and Charles H Wegmann, III |
| Volunteers of America Residential Re-Entry Center, William Barr, Michael Carvajal, Olugbenga Akanji and Federal Bureau of Prisons |
| 2:2020cv01126 |
| March 31, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Barry W Ashe |
| Janis van Meerveld |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2283 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER Denying #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis without prejudice to being refiled in conjunction with the filing of a signed Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Janis van Meerveld on 5/4/2020. (ajn)
|
| Filing 4 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Charles H Wegmann, III. Motion(s) referred to Janis van Meerveld. (pp) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE Regarding Local Civil Rule 54.7. Signed by Judge Barry W Ashe.(am) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT ProSe COMPLAINT: re #1 Complaint,. Please see attached letter for steps needed to remedy deficiency. Deficiency remedy due by 4/30/2020. (am) |
| Filing 1 **DEFICIENT**COMPLAINT against Olugbenga Akanji, William Barr, Michael Carvajal, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Volunteers of America Residential Re-Entry Center filed by Charles H. Weggman, III. (Attachments: #1 Attachment to Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(am) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
