Washington et al v. Smith et al
| Bruce Washington and Gregory Lane |
| Randy Smith, Jackson Bridel, Alexander Thomas, Shaun Wood, John Doe Employees of the St. Tammany Parish Sheriff's Office and Unidentified Parties |
| 2:2022cv00632 |
| March 10, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Lance M Africk |
| Michael North |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER granting #12 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint; Defendants shall file responsive pleadings no later than 5/31/2022. Signed by Judge Lance M Africk on 4/18/2022. (blg)
|
|
Filing 12
EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint, by Jackson Bridel, Randy Smith, Alexander Thomas, Shaun Wood. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)Attorney Chadwick William Collings added to party Jackson Bridel(pty:dft), Attorney Chadwick William Collings added to party Randy Smith(pty:dft), Attorney Chadwick William Collings added to party Alexander Thomas(pty:dft), Attorney Chadwick William Collings added to party Shaun Wood(pty:dft).(Collings, Chadwick)
|
|
Filing 11
WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed; waiver sent to Randy Smith on 3/11/2022, answer due 5/10/2022. (Collings, Chadwick)
|
|
Filing 10
WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed; waiver sent to Shaun Wood on 3/11/2022, answer due 5/10/2022. (Collings, Chadwick)
|
|
Filing 9
WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed; waiver sent to Jackson Bridel on 3/11/2022, answer due 5/10/2022. (Collings, Chadwick)
|
|
Filing 8
WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed; waiver sent to Alexander Thomas on 3/11/2022, answer due 5/10/2022. (Collings, Chadwick)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #4 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to Nora Sam Ahmed.; #5 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to Xuan Gong; #6 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to Elizabeth Myers Raulston. Signed by Judge Lance M Africk on 3/18/2022. (lw) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/6/2022: #1 Pro Hac Vice Notice) (lw).
|
|
Filing 6
EXPARTE/CONSENT Third MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice Raulston (Filing fee $ 100 receipt number BLAEDC-9275716) by Gregory Lane, Bruce Washington. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Proposed Order)(Snider, Megan)
|
|
Filing 5
EXPARTE/CONSENT Second MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice Gong (Filing fee $ 100 receipt number BLAEDC-9275715) by Gregory Lane, Bruce Washington. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Proposed Order)(Snider, Megan)
|
|
Filing 4
EXPARTE/CONSENT First MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice Ahmed (Filing fee $ 100 receipt number ALAEDC-9275713) by Gregory Lane, Bruce Washington. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Proposed Order)(Snider, Megan)
|
|
Filing 3
Summons Issued as to Jackson Bridel, Randy Smith, Alexander Thomas, Shaun Wood. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)(ko)
|
|
Filing 2
Initial Case Assignment to Judge Lance M Africk and Magistrate Judge Michael North. (cc)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT with jury demand against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ALAEDC-9269190) filed by Bruce Washington, Gregory Lane. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons)Attorney Megan E. Snider added to party Gregory Lane(pty:pla), Attorney Megan E. Snider added to party Bruce Washington(pty:pla).(Snider, Megan)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
