Cases 1 - 10 of 57
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024hc02047
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
THOMAS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv01046
Plaintiff:
CODY ALEXANDER THOMAS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
v. DONATE et al
as 5:2023cv01876
Defendant:
JANINE DONATE, KYLE RUSSELL, STEVEN MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. DONATE et al
as 5:2023cv01877
Plaintiff:
SARAH JACKSON
Defendant:
LEHIGH COUNTY, JANINE DONATE, KYLE RUSSELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alden Alexander Thomas Sr. v. Gigi Matterson et al
as 2:2023cv01268
Petitioner:
Alden Alexander Thomas, Sr.
Respondent:
Gigi Matterson and V. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Washington v. Thomas
as 23-30006
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Bruce Washington, Individually
Defendant / Appellant:
Alexander Thomas, in his individual capacity
Alexander Hebrard v. Jeremy Nofziger, et al
as 22-35327
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALEXANDER THOMAS HEBRARD
Defendant / Appellee:
JEREMY M. NOFZIGER, BRANDON KELLY, JASON BROWN and others
Washington et al v. Smith et al
as 2:2022cv00632
Plaintiff:
Bruce Washington and Gregory Lane
Defendant:
Randy Smith, Jackson Bridel, Alexander Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NUNEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv02672
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER THOMAS NUNEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hebrard v. Miller et al
as 3:2021cv00918
Defendant:
Jamie Miller, J. Varvska, Dr. Gulick and others
Plaintiff:
Alexander Thomas Hebrard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
