Thomas v. Craven County Courthouse et al
| Corey Alexander Thomas |
| Craven County Courthouse and Craven County District Attorney's Office |
| 5:2024hc02047 |
| March 4, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Louise Wood Flanagan |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Financial Disclosure Statement filed by Corey Alexander Thomas. (Castania, M) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Self-Representation filed by Corey Alexander Thomas. (Castania, M) |
| Filing 2 Document: Application to Proceed Without Prepaying Fees filed by Corey Alexander Thomas. (Filing fee paid.) (Castania, M) |
| Filing 1 Emergency Application of Writ of Mandamus and Injunction Relief (Filing fee $5, receipt number 600000101), filed by Corey Alexander Thomas. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Documents July 28, 2023, #2 Exhibit B - Craven County Indictments, #3 Exhibit C - Transcript - Craven County, 23 CRS 285347, #4 Exhibit D - Transcript - Craven County, 23 CRS 285347 and 23 CRS 702964, #5 Exhibit E - Booking Card, #6 Exhibit F - Motion to Disqualify, #7 Exhibit G - Motion of No Authority, Disqualification of Justice, #8 Exhibit H - Waiver of Counsel, #9 Other Attachments to Petition - Moorish Divine and National Movement, #10 Civil Cover Sheet) (Castania, M) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
