Cotton v. Hooper
Plaintiff: Gregory Cotton
Defendant: Tim Hooper
Respondent: Attorney General State of Louisiana
Case Number: 2:2023cv03629
Filed: August 17, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
Presiding Judge: Donna Phillips Currault
Referring Judge: Greg Gerard Guidry
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 5, 2023 Filing 8 USCA Case Number 23-30697 appealed to USCA 5th Circuit for #7 Notice of Appeal filed by Gregory Cotton. (js)
September 29, 2023 Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEAL filed by Gregory Cotton as to #6 Order on Motion for Reconsideration. (ss)
September 26, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that the #5 Motion for Reconsideration/Objection is DENIED. Signed by Judge Greg Gerard Guidry on 09/26/2023. (js)
September 20, 2023 Filing 5 MOTION for Reconsideration and Objection re #4 Transfer Case to 5th Circuit, filed by Gregory Cotton. (ss) Images QC'd on 10/2/2023 (aj).
September 14, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER transferring petition to U.S. Court of Appeals - 5th Circuit to determine if petitioner is allowed to file successive habeas petition in this court. IT IS ORDERED that Gregory Cottons 2254 petition be construed in part as a motion for authorization for the District Court to consider the second or successive claims raised therein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition be and hereby is TRANSFERRED to the United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals under the authority of 28 U.S.C. 1631 for that Court to determine whether petitioner is authorized under 28 U.S.C. 2244(b) to file the instant habeas corpus petition in this District Court. Signed by Judge Greg Gerard Guidry on 09/14/2023.(js)
September 12, 2023 Filing 3 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (28:2254) (Filing fee $ 5.00 Receipt No. 200003313) filed by Gregory Cotton. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibits, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(ss)
August 22, 2023 Filing 2 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT ProSe COMPLAINT: re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (28:2254). Please see attached letter for steps needed to remedy deficiency. Deficiency remedy due by 9/12/2023. (ss)
August 17, 2023 Filing 1 **DEFICIENT** PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (28:2254) filed by Gregory Cotton. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibits)(ss)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cotton v. Hooper
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gregory Cotton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tim Hooper
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Attorney General State of Louisiana
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?