Cases 1 - 10 of 298
Butler v. Hooper et al
as 2:2024cv01854
Unknown:
Tabari J. Butler
Defendant:
Tim Hooper
Respondent:
Louisiana State
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ross v. Hooper
as 24-30465
Respondent:
Tim Hooper, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
Petitioner:
Eric Ross
McCall v. LSP Investigation Service et al
as 3:2024cv00598
Defendant:
John Doe, Shirley Coody, LSP Investigation Service and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Wayne McCall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Hooper
as 24-30458
Respondent:
Tim Hooper, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
Petitioner:
Jordan Hicks
Thompkins v. Hooper et al
as 2:2024cv01761
Defendant:
Tim Hooper
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Plaintiff:
Toronzo D Thompkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Hooper
as 24-30439
Petitioner:
Cori Williams
Respondent:
Tim Hooper, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
Mitchell v. Hooper et al
as 3:2024cv00557
Respondent:
Tim Hooper and Merrick Garland
Petitioner:
Andrew Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Voice of the Experienced v. LeBlanc
as 24-30420
Plaintiff:
Voice of the Experienced, a membership organization on behalf of itself and its members, Myron Smith, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Damaris Jackson, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant:
James M. LeBlanc, Secretary, Department of Public Safety and Corrections, Tim Hooper, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, Misty Stagg, in her official capacity as Director of Prison Enterprises, Incorporated and others
Jacobs v. Hooper
as 24-30414
Petitioner:
Lawrence Jacobs, Jr.
Respondent:
Tim Hooper, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
Banks v. Hooper
as 24-30387
Petitioner:
Brian K. Banks
Respondent:
Tim Hooper, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
