Wei v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Service, et al.
Lin Wei |
Department of Homeland Security, Federal Bureau of Investigations, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and United States of America |
2:2024cv00831 |
April 3, 2024 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
Karen Wells Roby |
Sarah S Vance |
Mandamus & Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Department of Homeland Security, Federal Bureau of Investigations, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons)(cs) |
Filing 3 Summons Submitted for Issuance (Attachments: #1 Summons)(Yang, Donglai) |
Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Sarah S Vance and Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby. (kls) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Mandamus against Department of Homeland Security, Federal Bureau of Investigation, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, and United States of America (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ALAEDC-10467956) filed by Lin Wei. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet , #2 Exhibit case information)Attorney Donglai Yang added to party Lin Wei(pty:selreq).(Yang, Donglai) Modified filer/text on 4/3/2024 (cs). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.