Dupas v. Fletcher et al
| Raymon Corea Dupas |
| Sgt. Fletcher, Sgt. Goodwin, Reginald Young, Malcolm Banks, Shannon Doyle, Lavarre, Michael Guidry, Robert Doyle, Eli Harris and Sgt Blakely |
| 3:2009cv00144 |
| March 17, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| James J. Brady |
| Docia L Dalby |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
11
JUDGMENT. It is ordered, adjudged and decreed that this action is hereby dismissed, without prejudice. Signed by Judge James J. Brady on 10/14/09. (LSM, )
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4 . ORDERED that the Title 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint filed by Raymon Corea Dupas is hereby TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana. Signed by Judge Carl Barbier on 03/17/2009.(mmm, ) [Transferred from Louisiana Eastern on 3/17/2009.]
|
|
Filing
4
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Complaint filed by Raymon Corea Dupas. RECOMMENDED that the captioned matter be TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana. Objections to R&R due by 2/2/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby on 01/14/2009.(mmm ) [Transferred from Louisiana Eastern on 3/17/2009.]
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
