Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Honaker v. Lincoln County Jail
as 3:2024cv00138
Plaintiff:
Shannon Doyle Honaker
Defendant:
Lincoln County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wheeler v. Stone County MO Childrens Division et al
as 6:2017cv03211
Plaintiff:
Lacy Wheeler
Defendant:
Stone County MO Childrens Division, Mercy Hospital Administration, Jill Braden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Somerset Communications Group, LLC v. Wall To Wall Advertising, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv00629
Plaintiff:
Somerset Communications Group LLC
Defendant:
Wall To Wall Advertising Inc , Donald E MacCord Jr. , Andrea MacCord and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 75
Somerset Communications Group, LLC v. Wall To Wall Advertising, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv02084
Plaintiff:
Somerset Communications Group, LLC
Defendant:
Wall To Wall Advertising, Inc., Donald E MacCord Jr., Andrea MacCord and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Bankert v. North Attleborough Conservation Commission et al
as 1:2013cv11859
Defendant:
North Attleborough Conservation Commission , Clifford Bassett , Shannon Doyle and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Bankert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Dupas v. Fletcher et al
as 3:2009cv00144
Plaintiff:
Raymon Corea Dupas
Defendant:
Sgt. Fletcher, Sgt. Goodwin, Reginald Young and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Dupas v. Fletcher et al
as 2:2009cv00044
Plaintiff:
Raymon Corea Dupas
Defendant:
Sgt. Fletcher, Sgt. Goodwin, Reginald Young and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Dupas v. Lavarre et al
as 2:2009cv00045
Plaintiff:
Raymon Corea Dupas
Defendant:
Lavarre, Michael Guidry, Sgt. Goodwin and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Dupas v. Guidry et al
as 2:2008cv01910
Plaintiff:
Raymon Corea Dupas
Defendant:
Lavarre Guidry, Michael Guidry, Fletcher and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
