Wade v. Cain et al
Troy D. Wade |
Burl N. Cain, John L. Calvert, Andrea D. Ferguson and Steve Brengettsy |
3:2009cv00695 |
August 31, 2009 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
Baton Rouge Office |
East Baton Rouge |
Christine Noland |
Ralph E. Tyson |
None |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 78 RULING Adopting 76 Report and Recommendations, of the U.S. Magistrate Judge and adopts it as the court's opinion herein. Accordingly, the defendants' 54 Motion for Summary Judgment will be granted, dismissing the plaintiff's claims asserted against defendants Andrea Ferguson and Steve Brengettsy, and this action will be dismissed.. Signed by Chief Judge Ralph E. Tyson on 2/11/2011. (CMM) |
Filing 74 RULING Adopting 52 Report and Recommendations of the U.S. Magistrate Judge...Defts 19 Motion to Dismiss all Official Capacity Claims and Individual Capacity Claims as to Defendants Cain, Calvert and Brengettsy, are granted in part, dismissing the plaintiff's claims asserted against defendants Burl Cain and John Calvert, with prejudice, and dismissing the plaintiff's claim asserted against defendant Steve Brengettsy in the defendant's official capacity only. This matter is referred back for further proceedings in connection with the plaintiff's claims asserted against defendants Steve Brengettsy and Andrea Ferguson. Signed by Chief Judge Ralph E. Tyson on 8/24/2010. (JDL, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.