Cases 1 - 10 of 61
Darryl Puderer v. Burl Cain, et al
as 19-30809
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARRYL PUDERER
Defendant / Appellee:
TRISH FOSTER, Legal Programs Director, Employed at Louisiana State Penitentiary, Individually and in their official capacities, BURL N. CAIN, Warden, Individually and in their official capacities, TIMOTHY DELANEY, Assistant Warden, Individually and in their official capacities and others
Gaspard v. Unknown First Defendant et al
as 3:2019cv00478
Defendant:
Various United States Magistrate Judges, Unknown Department of Corrections Offender/Inmate Counsel Substitute (2 of 2), Simien & Simien, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Gaspard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Puderer v. Cain et al
as 3:2019cv00156
Plaintiff:
Darryl Puderer
Defendant:
Burl N. Cain, James LeBlanc and Trish Foster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter et al v. Cain et al
as 3:2017cv00201
Defendant:
Barrett Boeker, Burl N. Cain, James Cruze and others
Plaintiff:
Christa Carter, Irma Jean Carter and Unknown Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Wilson v. Cain et al
as 3:2016cv00607
Defendant:
Burl N. Cain, Matthew Gamble, Stephanie Lamartiniere and others
Plaintiff:
Lacal Lucky Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Newton v. Cain
as 2:2016cv01117
Defendant:
Burl N Cain
Plaintiff:
Sean Bernard Newton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Goudeau v. Cain
as 2:2016cv00732
Plaintiff:
Ivan Enrico Goudeau
Defendant:
Burl N Cain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Holts v. Wright et al
as 3:2016cv00065
Defendant:
Burl N. Cain, Jimmy Smith and Robert Wright
Plaintiff:
James Bernard Holts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rutherford Jones v. Burl Cain
as 16-30060
Petitioner - Appellant:
RUTHERFORD JONES
Respondent - Appellee:
BURL N. CAIN
King v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2015cv00586
Defendant:
Burl N. Cain and James M. LeBlanc
Plaintiff:
Michael Edward King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
