Ryder et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
Lisa Barras, Herbert Paul Barras, Jr., Lori Powell, Michael Todd Ryder and Nell Theresa Ryder |
Chesapeake Energy Corporation, Chesapeake Operating L.L.C., Earthstone Operating LLC, Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P., Kinder Morgan G.P. Inc., Union Pacific Railroad Company and Union Pacific Railroad Corporation |
3:2015cv00431 |
July 1, 2015 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
Baton Rouge Office |
Shelly D. Dick |
Stephen C. Riedlinger |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 243 RULING: granting 197 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. This matter is Dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge Shelly D. Dick on 06/19/2018. (ELW) |
Filing 207 RULING granting 84 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Plaintiff's Lights and Gates Claims and 170 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Plaintiff's inadequate Audible Warning Claims. Signed by Judge Shelly D. Dick on 9/29/2017. (LLH) |
Filing 202 RULING denying 172 MOTION to Compel Discovery and Impose Sanctions. Plaintiff's are granted a limited extension of the fact discovery deadline through and including 10/15/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Erin Wilder-Doomes on 9/20/2017. (LLH) |
Filing 114 ORDER: That the Statement of Citizenship filed by Earthstone Operating, LLC a/k/a Oak Valley Operating, LLC and the Statement of Citizenship of Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, LP shall be STRICKEN from the record. Earthstone Operating, LLC a/k/a Oak V alley Operating, LLC and Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, LP shall each have seven (7) days from the date of this Order to file a Statement of Citizenship that adequately alleges citizenship. Signed by Magistrate Judge Erin Wilder-Doomes on 12/5/2016. (EDC) |
Filing 102 RULING AND ORDER For the reasons stated herein, the Motion to Compel 34 is GRANTED. The Motion for Protective Order 35 is DENIED. ORDERED that Union Pacific shall provide a corporate representative(s) to testify regarding to topics 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 and shall produce documents responsive to production requests 3, 8 and 11. Signed by Magistrate Judge Erin Wilder-Doomes on 11/14/2016. (ELW) Modified on 11/14/2016 (ELW). |
Filing 65 RULING denying 49 MOTION for Protective Order and to Quash the Video Deposition of a Corporate Designee Regarding the Effectiveness of Lights and Gates. Signed by Magistrate Judge Erin Wilder-Doomes on 5/5/2016. (LLH) |
Filing 64 RULING granting Plaintiff's 46 Motion to Compel and Pacific's 51 Motion for Protective Order is DENIED. Additionally, in light of this ruling, Plaintiffs previous 42 Motion to Compel filed on 2/19/2016 is DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Magistrate Judge Erin Wilder-Doomes on 5/4/2016. (LLH) |
Filing 58 SCHEDULING CONFERENCE REPORT AND ORDER: Parties are to attempt to reach an agreement as to production of the locomotive video within ten (10) days from the date of this Scheduling Conference Report and Order. Plaintiff shall submit briefing regardin g the basis for Union Pacific's duty to provide lights and/or gates at the crossing at issue in this litigation. Union Pacific submit briefing on the basis for its assertion that it owes no legal duty (statutory or otherwise) to provide lights a nd/or gates at this crossing. Supplemental briefing, not to exceed five (5) pages, shall be filed within ten (10) days of this Scheduling Conference Report and Order. The Court considered the parties' proposed schedule set forth in the Joint Status Report. The Court will issue a separate Scheduling Order consistent with the parties' proposed schedule as modified during the April 18, 2016 conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Erin Wilder-Doomes on 4/19/2016. (BLR) |
Filing 41 RULING denying 15 and 23 Motions to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Signed by Judge Shelly D. Dick on 2/3/2016. (LLH) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.