Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Michael Ryder, et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, et al
as 18-30824
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL TODD RYDER, both individually and as natural Father of on behalf of Michael Todd Ryder, II, LORI POWELL, both individually and as natural Mother on behalf of Michael Todd Ryder, II, NELL THERESA RYDER, both individually and as natural Mother on behalf of John Cameron Watson and others
Defendant - Appellee:
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD CORPORATION, KINDER MORGAN GP, INCORPORATED and others
Ryder et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
as 3:2015cv00430
Plaintiff:
Lisa Barras, Herbert Paul Barras, Jr., Lori Powell and others
Defendant:
Chesapeake Energy Corporation, Chesapeake Operating L.L.C., Earthstone Operating L.L.C. a/k/a Oak Valley Operating L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ryder et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
as 3:2015cv00431
Plaintiff:
Lisa Barras, Herbert Paul Barras, Jr., Lori Powell and others
Defendant:
Chesapeake Energy Corporation, Chesapeake Operating L.L.C., Earthstone Operating LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ladner et al v. Coachmen Industries, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv03986
Plaintiff:
Kevin Richard Ladner , Mike P. Ladner , Tiffany Nicole Ladner and others
Defendant:
Coachmen Industries, Inc., Coachmen Recreational Vehicle Company, LLC, Coachmen Recreational Vehicles of Georgia, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Ladner et al v. Coachmen Industries, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv07934
Plaintiff:
Kevin Richard Ladner, Mike P. Ladner, Tiffany Nicole Ladner and others
Defendant:
Coachmen Industries, Inc., Coachmen Recreational Vehicle Company, LLC, Coachmen Recreational Vehicles of Georgia, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
