Serigny v. LeBlanc et al
| Francis J. Serigny |
| James M. LeBlanc and Sheryl M. Ranatza |
| 3:2020cv00727 |
| October 23, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Brian A Jackson |
| Erin Wilder-Doomes |
| Prisoner Conditions |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Confirmation of receipt of payment from FRANCIS SERIGNY in the amount of $53.42. Transaction posted on 11/10/2020. Receipt number 4699030582 processed by lhiltz. (TDA) |
Filing 3
ORDER granting #2 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. It is ordered that the plaintiff pay an initial partial filing fee of $53.42 in accordance with 28 USC 1915. A copy of this order shall be sent to the plaintiff and to Centralized Inmate Banking. Filing Fee due by 11/19/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Erin Wilder-Doomes on 10/29/2020. (ELW)
|
| MOTION(S) REFERRED: #2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Statement of Account. This motion is now pending before the USMJ. (KMW) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Statement of Account by Francis J. Serigny. (KMW) |
| ***Set CASE REFERRED Flag (PPS) (KMW) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against James M. LeBlanc, Sheryl M. Ranatza, filed by Francis J. Serigny. (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Attachment, #3 cover Letter)(KMW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
