Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Sneed v. Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections et al
as 3:2022cv00207
Plaintiff:
Bobby Ray Sneed
Defendant:
Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections, Committee on Parole, Timothy Hooper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Sneed v. Louisiana Department Of Public Safety and Corrections et al
as 3:2022cv00205
Plaintiff:
Bobby Ray Sneed
Defendant:
Louisiana Department Of Public Safety and Corrections, Francis M Abbott, Chairperson Sheryl M. Ranatza and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Reed v. Ranatza
as 3:2021cv02272
Plaintiff:
Christopher Reed
Defendant:
Sheryl M Ranatza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Serigny v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2020cv00727
Plaintiff:
Francis J. Serigny
Defendant:
James M. LeBlanc and Sheryl M. Ranatza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ondek v. Ranatza et al
as 3:2016cv00725
Defendant:
James M. LeBlanc, Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections and Sheryl M. Ranatza
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Ondek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson v. Natchitoches et al
as 1:2015cv00923
Plaintiff:
Louis Vernon Jackson
Defendant:
City of Natchitoches, Stanley Williams, Jeffery Townson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2015cv00263
Plaintiff:
James Coleman
Defendant:
James M LeBlanc and Sheryl M Ranatza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Payton v. Purcell et al
as 2:2013cv06747
Plaintiff:
Raymond Payton
Defendant:
William Purcell and Sheryl M Ranatza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenneth Owens v. James LeBlanc, et al
as 13-31009
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH W. OWENS
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES M. LEBLANC and SHERYLE M. RANATZA
Glenn Damond v. James LeBlanc, et al
as 13-30760
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GLENN CALVIN DAMOND
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES LEBLANC, CHAIRMAN OF BOARD OF PAROLE, DIVISION OF PAROLE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
