Brown v. City of Baton Rouge et al
Pauline Brown |
City of Baton Rouge, East Baton Rouge Parish Department of Public Works and East Baton Rouge Parish Department of Social Services |
3:2022cv01059 |
December 27, 2022 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
Richard L Bourgeois |
John W deGravelles |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 Summons Not Issued: Counsel has requested issuance of a summons for East Baton Rouge Parish. The named person/entity is not reflected on the docket sheet as a party in the case. Therefore, summons will not be issued. (ELW) |
Filing 11 Summons Issued as to City of Baton Rouge. (NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve both the summons and all attachments in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4.) (ELW) |
Filing 10 Summons Submitted as to East Baton Rouge (Cusimano, Chelsea) (Main Document 10 replaced on 1/25/2023) (ELW). |
Filing 9 Summons Submitted as to City of Baton Rouge, through Counsel of Record: Baton Rouge City Attorney's Office (Cusimano, Chelsea) (Main Document 9 replaced on 1/25/2023) (ELW). |
Filing 8 Summons Not Issued: Counsel has requested issuance of a summons for East Baton Rouge Parish. The named person/entity is not reflected on the docket sheet as a party in the case. Therefore, summons will not be issued. (ELW) |
Filing 7 Summons Issued as to East Baton Rouge Parish Department of Public Works, East Baton Rouge Parish Department of Social Services. (NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve both the summons and all attachments in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4.) (ELW) |
Filing 6 Summons Submitted as to East Baton Rouge, Department of Public Works, through its Counsel of Record: Baton Rouge Parish Attorneys Office (Cusimano, Chelsea) (Main Document 6 replaced on 1/23/2023) (ELW). Modified on 1/23/2023 to flatten document (ELW). |
Filing 5 Summons Submitted as to East Baton Rouge - Department of Social Services through its Counsel of Record: Baton Rouge Parish Attorneys Office (Cusimano, Chelsea) (Main Document 5 replaced on 1/23/2023) (ELW). Modified on 1/23/2023 to flatten document (ELW). |
Filing 4 Summons Submitted as to East Baton Rouge, through its Counsel of Record: Baton Rouge Parish Attorneys Office (Sternberg, Scott) (Main Document 4 replaced on 1/23/2023) (ELW). Modified on 1/23/2023 to flatten document (ELW). |
Filing 3 SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ORDER: Telephone Scheduling Conference set for 3/30/2023 at 02:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois Jr. Counsel for Plaintiff(s) shall initiate the call to all parties then contact the Court at (225) 389-3602. Status Report due by 3/16/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois, Jr. on 1/18/2023. (SGO) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY with LR 7.1 as to #1 Complaint. Failure to file a Certificate of Interested Persons REQUIRED CORRECTION: Within one business day, the filer shall file a Certificate of Interested Persons and the interested persons shall be added to CM/ECF by the filer using the event Certificate of Interested Persons. (EDC) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against City of Baton Rouge, East Baton Rouge Parish Department of Public Works, East Baton Rouge Parish Department of Social Services ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ALAMDC-2520034.), filed by Pauline Brown. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Cusimano, Chelsea) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.