Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv02619
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Harris v. Reeves et al
as 3:2024cv00547
Plaintiff:
Gerard Vondrake Harris
Defendant:
Robert S. Reeves, Cathy S. Palmer, Ralph Todd and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv05921
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01059
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Brown v. TPUSA Inc
as 2:2019cv00228
Plaintiff:
PAULINE BROWN
Defendant:
TPUSA, Inc. d/b/a Teleperformance USA and TPUSA Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
BROWN v. PFIZER, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv00198
Defendant:
TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., TAKEDA DEVELOPMENT CENTER AMERICAS, INC. F/K/A TAKEDA GLOBAL RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT CENTER, INC., TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY LIMITED and others
Plaintiff:
PAULINE BROWN
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brown v. Cox
as 3:2017cv00384
Plaintiff:
Pauline Brown
Defendant:
Dale Wesley Cox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brown et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2015cv04511
Plaintiff:
Pauline Brown and Robert Brown
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Browning v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2014cv01908
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Pamela Pauline Browning
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
Brown et al v.NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC
as 1:2014cv12667
Plaintiff:
Pauline Brown and Henry Brown
Defendant:
Nationstar Mortgage LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
