Morgan v. LeBlanc
| Edward J. Morgan |
| James LeBlanc, Raman Singh, Sherwood Poret, Stacye Falgout, Darrel Vannoy, Timothy Hooper, Tracy Falgout, Randy Lavespere, William Rosso and Jacob Johnson |
| 3:2023cv00107 |
| February 14, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Richard L Bourgeois |
| Shelly D Dick |
| Prisoner Conditions |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against James LeBlanc, Raman Singh, Sherwood Poret, Stacye Falgout, Darrel Vannoy, Timothy Hooper, Tracy Falgout, Randy Lavespere, William Rosso, Jacob Johnson, filed by Edward J. Morgan.(NLT) |
| Filing 4 Letter of Deficiency: The Clerk has filed your new suit. However, it is deficient in the areas as stated herein. The deficiency must be corrected within the given time frame. Amended Pleadings due by 3/30/2023. (EDC) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Edward J. Morgan (NLT) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Statement of Account by Edward J. Morgan (NLT) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against James LeBlanc, filed by Edward J. Morgan.(NLT) |
| MOTION(S) REFERRED: #2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Statement of Account, #3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel. This motion is now pending before the USMJ., ***Set CASE REFERRED Flag (PPS) (NLT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
