Cases 1 - 10 of 56
Burnham v. Hooper et al
as 3:2024cv00335
Plaintiff:
Richard Burnham
Defendant:
Tim Hooper and Jacob Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. White et al
as 1:2024cv01671
Plaintiff:
Jacob Johnson
Defendant:
Leander White and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Webster v. Anderson et al
as 2:2024cv04024
Plaintiff:
Derrick Orlando Webster
Defendant:
Jeffrey Anderson, Dywayne Hoffstetter, William Bresnaham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Triplett v. LeBlanc
as 24-30068
Plaintiff:
Willie Triplett
Defendant:
James LeBlanc, Jacob Johnson, Randy Lavespere and others
Morgan v. LeBlanc
as 23-30851
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Edward J. Morgan
Defendant / Appellee:
James LeBlanc, Secretary, Louisiana Department of Corrections, Raman Singh, Sherwood Poret and others
Johnson v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03709
Plaintiff:
Jacob Johnson
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv17911
Plaintiff:
JACOB JOHNSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01690
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4311 Uniformed Service Employment or Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) - Discrimination
Doe v. Boyce et al
as 0:2023cv00075
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Todd Boyce, Head Chaplin Todd Boyce, James David Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00869
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
