Mitchell v. Hooper et al
| Dan Mitchell |
| Timothy Hooper, Donnie Bordelon, Sheila Robinson, Ashleigh Fleming, Kristen Thomas and Stephanie Michel |
| 3:2025cv00549 |
| June 18, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Shelly D Dick |
| Erin Wilder-Doomes |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER denying #3 Motion for Appointment of Counsel; denying #2 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. By no later than September 23, 2025, Plaintiff Dan Mitchell, shall pay the $405.00 filing fee to the Clerk of this Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Erin Wilder-Doomes on 09/02/2025. (CIS)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Statement of Account by Dan Mitchell. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Pleading; Order, #2 Letter to USM) (CIS) |
| MOTION(S) REFERRED: #2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Statement of Account, #3 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel. These motions are now pending before the USMJ. (CIS) |
| ***Set CASE REFERRED Flag (PPS) (CIS) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel by Dan Mitchell. (CIS) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Donnie Bordelon, Ashleigh Fleming, Timothy Hooper, Stephanie Michel, Sheila Robinson, Kristen Thomas, filed by Dan Mitchell. (Attachments: #1 Letter from Court, #2 Summons, #3 Letter re Disability Rights, #4 Declarations) (CIS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.