Turner v. David Wade Correctional Center

Plaintiff: Carlton Turner
Defendant: Warden of David Wade Correctional Center
Case Number: 1:2012cv01167
Filed: May 4, 2012
Court: Louisiana Western District Court
Office: Alexandria Office
County: Claiborne
Presiding Judge: Dee D Drell
Referring Judge: James D Kirk
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28:2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
October 17, 2012 12 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT ADOPTING 9 Report and Recommendations. IT IS ORDERED that Turner's second and successive petition for writ of habeas corpus is TRANSFERRED to the United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in accordance with 28 U.S.C. Section 1631. Signed by Judge James T Trimble, Jr on 10/15/12. (crt,Burge, J)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Turner v. David Wade Correctional Center
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Warden of David Wade Correctional Center
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carlton Turner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?