Cases 1 - 10 of 76
Roy Ates v. David Wade Correctional Center
as 15-30186
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROY EDWARD ATES
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN OF DAVID WADE CORRECTIONAL CENTER, on behalf of State of Louisiana
Harold Black v. David Wade Correctional Center
as 13-30732
Petitioner - Appellant:
HAROLD JOE BLACK
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN OF DAVID WADE CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Morian Spivey v. Jerry Goodwin, Warden
as 13-30538
Petitioner - Appellant:
MORIAN SPIVEY
Respondent - Appellee:
JERRY GOODWIN, Warden of David Wade Correctional Center
Raymond Williams v. Jerry Goodwin, Warden
as 13-30459
Petitioner - Appellant:
RAYMOND WILLIAMS
Respondent - Appellee:
JERRY GOODWIN, Warden of David Wade Correctional Center
Fletcher v. David Wade Correctional Center
as 1:2013cv00579
Plaintiff:
James O Fletcher
Defendant:
Warden of David Wade Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Holland v. David Wade Correctional Center
as 2:2013cv00489
Plaintiff:
Paul S Holland
Defendant:
Warden of David Wade Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Macon v. David Wade Correctional Center
as 5:2013cv00479
Plaintiff:
Rodney Wayne Macon
Defendant:
Warden of David Wade Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ealy v. David Wade Correctional Center
as 5:2013cv00465
Plaintiff:
Howell Ealy
Defendant:
Warden of David Wade Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Angelo Gonzalez v. Jerry Goodwin
as 13-30174
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANGELO A. GONZALEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN OF DAVID WADE CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Evans v. David Wade Correctional Center
as 5:2013cv00360
Plaintiff:
Tony R Evans
Defendant:
Warden of David Wade Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
