Jones v. Henson et al
| Ouncre D Jones |
| Victor E Jones, Jr and Roger Henson |
| 1:2018cv01160 |
| September 5, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| Dee D Drell |
| Joseph H L Perez-Montes |
| Prisoner Petitions: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 27, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. IT IS RECOMMENDED that #8 Amended Complaint filed by Ouncre D Jones be DENIED AND DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Objections to R&R due by 11/13/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes on 10/30/2018. (crt,Tice, Y)(a) |
Filing 12
ORDER granting #5 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Initial Partial Filing Fee due in the amount of $8.07. It is further ordered that plaintiff make payments of 20 percent of income for preceding month until $350.00 has been paid in full. Clerk manually noticed Prison Accounts Officer. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes on 9/25/2018. (crt,Haik, K)
|
| Filing 11 PROPOSED ORDER re #5 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis referred to Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes. (Public entry, but no electronic notice). (crt,Haik, K) |
| Filing 10 CORRECTIVE DOCUMENT entitled Accounts officer page filed by Ouncre D Jones regarding #5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(crt,Haik, K) |
|
Filing 7
ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #6 Motion for Court Order re IFP Application. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes on 9/19/2018. (jud,Perez-Montes, Joseph)
|
| Filing 9 REQUEST from Plaintiff for all evidence sent by plaintiff. Clerk mailed copywork fee letter on 9/20/18. (Public entry, but no electronic notice.) (Attachments: #1 Copy work fee letter, #2 Envelope) (crt,HaikSld, K) |
| Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Ouncre D Jones. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(crt,HaikSld, K) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Court Order Re IFP Application by Ouncre D Jones. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes. (Attachments: #1 Accounts officer page, #2 Envelope)(crt,Haik, K) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Ouncre D Jones. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(crt,Haik, K) Modified to remove deficiency on 9/24/2018 (Haik, K). |
|
Filing 4
MEMORANDUM ORDER: Plaintiff failed to submit filing fee or a completed IFP application. Pro Se Deadline to comply with deficiency set for 10/9/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes on 9/7/2018. (Attachments: #1 IFP Application)(crt,ThomasSld, T)
|
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW FINDING: Having reviewed the pleadings, and any amended pleadings, the court finds that subject matter jurisdiction exists pursuant to: 28 U.S.C. section 1331. This finding is preliminary and may be reconsidered sua sponte or on appropriate motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes on 9/7/2018. (jud,Perez-Montes, Joseph) |
| Filing 2 PROPOSED MEMORANDUM ORDER referred to Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes. (Public entry, but no electronic notice). (crt,Thigpen, M) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Roger Henson, Victor E Jones, Jr filed by Ouncre D Jones. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Envelope)(crt,Miletello, A) |
| CASE Assigned to Judge Dee D Drell and Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes. (crt,Thigpen, M) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
