Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Johnson v. Wright et al
as 1:2022cv06037
Plaintiff:
Ron Johnson and Ron Cleon Johnson
Defendant:
Robert Stuart Wright, Roger Henson, Aaron Sines and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jefferson v. Sylvester et al
as 1:2022cv01247
Plaintiff:
Rynell Jefferson
Defendant:
Lala B Sylvester, Roger Henson and Tonya Reliford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Southern Insurance Company of Virginia v. Coyne et al
as 1:2021cv03445
Plaintiff:
Southern Insurance Company of Virginia and Roger Henson Trucking, LLC
Defendant:
Peter Coyne, Trey Adams, Haneef Whitehead and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Robinson v. Sers et al
as 1:2021cv00073
Plaintiff:
Kenard Robinson
Defendant:
Glen Sers and Roger Henson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henson v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01715
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Roger Henson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Henson et al
as 1:2018cv01160
Plaintiff:
Ouncre D Jones
Defendant:
Victor E Jones, Jr and Roger Henson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hudson Insurance Company v. 18 Speed Trucking et al
as 1:2018cv00880
Defendant:
BD&J Trucking, LLC, Trans-Lease Mid Continent Van, Trans Recovery - DH Transportation and others
Plaintiff:
Hudson Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Edwards v. Sines et al
as 1:2017cv01416
Plaintiff:
Dekarius Germane Edwards
Defendant:
Sines, Metoyer, Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carvill v. Roger Henson Trucking LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00037
Plaintiff:
Richard W Carvill
Defendant:
Roger Henson Trucking LLC and Samuel E Dedmon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ARAUJO et al v. DOUGLAS et al
as 2:2015cv03800
Plaintiff:
LUCAS ARAUJO and RAMON DEOLIVEIRA
Defendant:
JAMES A DOUGLAS , ROGER HENSON TRUCKING, LLC , JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
