Ramos v. Martinez et al
| Sandalio Ramos |
| Felipe Martinez, Jr, Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States Attorney General and U S Attorney General |
| 2:2023cv00585 |
| May 3, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| James D Cain |
| Kathleen Kay |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Sandalio Ramos. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum / Brief, #2 Exhibits, #3 Envelope)(crt,Haik, K) |
| FILING FEE RECEIVED: on behalf of Sandalio Ramos in the amount of $5.00, receipt number 100000279. (crt,Bunting, M) |
Filing 3
MEMORANDUM ORDER: Plaintiff failed to submit documents on approved forms. (Pro Se Deadline to comply with deficiency set for 6/5/2023). Signed by Magistrate Judge Kathleen Kay on 5/4/2023. (Attachments: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Form (2241))(crt,Devillier, W)
|
| Filing 2 PROPOSED MEMORANDUM ORDER Referred to Magistrate Judge Kathleen Kay. Motion Ripe Deadline set for 5/3/2023. (crt,Devillier, W) |
| Filing 1 DEFICIENT PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Sandalio Ramos. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Envelope)(crt,Williams, K). Petition not on approved form. |
| CASE Assigned to Judge James D Cain, Jr and Magistrate Judge Kathleen Kay. (crt,Devillier, W) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
