Parker v. Lee
Plaintiff: Darryl D Parker
Defendant: Chad Lee
Case Number: 3:2011cv00305
Filed: February 22, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana
Office: Monroe Office
County: Franklin
Presiding Judge: Karen L Hayes
Presiding Judge: Robert G James
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 10, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 12 MEMORANDUM ORDER re 7 Memorandum Order and 10 Response in Opposition (NOT Motions) filed by Darryl D Parker. Since Plaintiff has failed to pay the filing fee as directed, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's civil rights Complaint is hereby DISMISSED and his complaint and associated pleadings are STRICKEN. Signed by Chief Judge Robert G James on 8/10/11. (crt,DickersonSld, D)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Parker v. Lee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Darryl D Parker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chad Lee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?