Cases 1 - 10 of 137
Monson v. USA
as 0:2024cv00166
Petitioner:
Chad Lee Monson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
KELLER v. ALLISON et al
as 3:2023cv00136
Plaintiff:
JOHN W. KELLER
Defendant:
GARY ALLISON, TOMMI HAMILTON, RUSSELL CONRAD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robles et al v. Lee et al
as 2:2023cv11456
Plaintiff:
Laura Robles and Frank Vincent Robles, III
Defendant:
Chad Lee and Roseville, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tran v. Franklin Parish Detention Center et al
as 2:2022cv01161
Plaintiff:
Tam Minh Tran
Defendant:
Franklin Parish Detention Center, Kelvin Cobb and Chad Lee
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tran v. Franklin Parish Detention Center et al
as 3:2022cv00891
Plaintiff:
Tran M Tran and Tam Minh Tran
Defendant:
Franklin Parish Detention Center, Kelvin Cobb and Chad Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anthony v. Louisiana et al
as 3:2022cv00815
Plaintiff:
Kennith Wade Anthony
Defendant:
State of Louisiana, Dept of Public Safety & Corrections, Chad Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Lee, et al
as 2:2022cv00725
Plaintiff:
British James
Defendant:
Chad Lee
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James v. Lee
as 5:2021cv03839
Plaintiff:
British James
Defendant:
Chad Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Daniels v. County of Oakland et al
as 2:2021cv12303
Plaintiff:
Gayle Daniels
Defendant:
County of Oakland, Dayna DeMeester, Joshua Wurfel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vonk v. USA
as 3:2021cv00321
Petitioner:
Chad Lee Vonk
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
