Hamilton, et al v. Granholm, et al
| John Hamilton, John Hamilton, Jr., Jeremy Hamilton, Michael Hamilton, Jo-Bet, Incorporated, Garter Belt, Incorporated, Hamilton's Henry the VIII Lounge, Incorporated and Hamilton's Bogart, Incorporated |
| Paul Martin, Hillard Hampton, III, Helen Foster, Inkster, City of, John D. O'Hair, Kenneth Brown, Anthony Abdullah and Nida R. Samona |
| Terrence Haugabook |
| Martin |
| 2:2001cv74698 |
| August 21, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Detroit Office |
| Avern Cohn |
| Civil Rights: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
337
ORDER Amending re 335 Memorandum Opinion & Order Signed by District Judge Avern Cohn. (JOwe)
|
|
Filing
335
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER dismissing City of Inkster as a defendant, dismissing all first amendment claims, dismissing John Hamilton, the John L. Hamilton Retained Annuity Trust, John Hamilton, Jr., Jeremy Hamilton, and Michael Hamilton as plaintiffs, dis missing plaintiffs' takings claim, dismissing plaintiffs' conversion claim, dismissing plaintiffs' larceny claim and granting summary judgment in favor of Antony Abdullah, Paul Martin and Kenneth Brown. Signed by District Judge Avern Cohn. (DPer)
|
|
Filing
334
JUDGMENT in favor of defendants and the case is dismissed as to defendants City of Romulus, Michael Ondejko, Van Buren Township, Marc Abdilla, Bryce Kelley and John Doe Enforcement Officers (DTyl)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
