Smith v. Catinella et al
| Jasen Smith |
| Bill Catinella, Sal Ahmed, Sherry Burt, Will Riley, C Bradshaw, Yonkie and Prince |
| 2:2008cv14118 |
| December 1, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Detroit Office |
| David M. Lawson |
| Virginia M Morgan |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| No cause code entered |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
53
ORDER Adopting 44 Report and Recommendation, Overruling 52 Plaintiff's Objections, Granting 31 Motion for Summary Judgment, and Dismissing certain claims with prejudice and without prejudice. Signed by District Judge David M. Lawson. (DWor)
|
|
Filing
44
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION to Grant 31 MOTION for Summary Judgment Based on Lack of Exhaustion, The Absence of a Genuine Issue of Material Fact, and Immunity, Brief in Support, Index of Exhibits, Exhibits A through E, with Certificate of Service filed by Prince, Sal Ahmed, Yonkie, Bill Catinella, Will Riley, Sherry Burt, C Bradshaw - Signed by Magistrate Judge Virginia M Morgan. (JJoh)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER Adopting 21 Report and Recommendation, Overruling 38 Plaintiff's Objections to the Report and Recomendation, Denying 3 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by District Judge David M. Lawson. (DWor)
|
|
Filing
21
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION to Deny 3 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Jasen Smith - Signed by Magistrate Judge Virginia M Morgan. (JJoh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
