Cases 1 - 10 of 100
BAILEY v. IBENJI et al
as 8:2026cv02459
Plaintiff:
TERRELLE ROBERT BAILEY
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER IBENJI, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER IGIZMO, Prince George's County Maryland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Scott v. Leon
as 2:2026cv02037
Petitioner:
Artie Scott and Isayah Rothschild Prince
Respondent:
Leon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Leon
as 1:2026cv24208
Plaintiff:
Artie Scott and Isayah Rothschild Prince
Defendant:
Officer Leon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Miller (Arroyo)
as 26-1640
Defendant:
GERALD MILLER, ROY HALE, DAVID ROBINSON and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2026cv00182
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Edwards v. USA
as 6:2026cv00190
Petitioner:
Prince
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Yeager et al v. Horry County Police Department et al
as 4:2026cv02317
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Yeager and Ellen Rodriguez
Defendant:
Horry County Police Department, Lt. Kevin Michael Cast, Captain Danny Furr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Black v. Lybrand et al
as 6:2026cv00279
Plaintiff:
Sarah Daniel Black
Defendant:
Jay Keith Lybrand, Kaila Rountree, Kristina Head and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-1743
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Lewis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2026cv06839
Plaintiff:
Prince Lewis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
