Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv14967
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00378
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv02132
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Anderson v. Smoke et al
as 2:2026cv00928
Defendant:
Pamela Butler, Prince Etheridge and Bradley Smoke
Plaintiff:
Carlos Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv04584
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv04583
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 ed Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03666
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Cesario, et al. v. Saxe, et al.
as 26-7272
Defendant:
COLLEEN SMITH, TIM LUGO, MYLES MINTER and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID PREKA and JOHN CESARIO
Christopher De Rossitte v. Jerry Byers, et al
as 26-3227
Defendant:
William Straughn, Deputy Director, Rolonda R. Scruggs, Disciplinary Hearing Officer, Sergeant Cody Scroggins and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Eugene De Rossitte, now known as Ikara Christiana Earnestine Euge Vagante De Rossitte
Prince v. Nevro Corporation et al
as 3:2026cv12733
Defendant:
Globus Medical, Inc. and Nevro Corporation
Plaintiff:
Thomas Prince
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
