Cases 1 - 10 of 60
Davis v. Warden
as 2:2024cv00043
Petitioner:
De'Maurea Davis, Yae-Yae and Yae Prince
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Price v. Ames et al
as 2:2023cv00784
Plaintiff:
Prince A. Price
Defendant:
Donald F. Ames, William K. Marshals and W.V. Divisions Correction Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. Thompson et al
as 2:2023cv00693
Plaintiff:
Prince A. Price
Defendant:
Ronnie Thompson, William K. Marshall and Division Corrections Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prince v. River Cities Anesthesia, PLLC et al
as 3:2022cv00349
Plaintiff:
William Prince
Defendant:
River Cities Anesthesia, PLLC, Bartlett Allen Stone, Nuvasive Clinical Services Monitoring, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00414
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Prince v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv04365
Plaintiff:
Wilma Prince
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. United States et al
as 2:2017cv00134
Plaintiff:
Prince Jones
Defendant:
United States, J. Riffle, T. George and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jones v. United States of America et al
as 3:2017cv00126
Plaintiff:
Prince Jones
Defendant:
United States of America, J. Riffle, T. George and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00148
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Prince v. Sears Holdings Corporation et al
as 1:2017cv00142
Plaintiff:
Billy E. Prince
Defendant:
Sears Holdings Corporation, Sears Holdings Corporation Administrative Committee and Prudential Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
