Davis v. Warden
| De'Maurea Davis, Yae-Yae and Yae Prince |
| Warden |
| 2:2024cv00043 |
| January 26, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Joseph R Goodwin |
| Dwane L Tinsley |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 APPLICATION TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FEES AND COSTS by De'Maurea Davis. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) (skm) (Modified on 2/20/2024 to note motion is referred to the MJ) (ts). |
| MOTION REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley: #5 APPLICATION by De'Maurea Davis to Proceed without Prepayment of Fees and Costs. (skm) |
| Filing 4 LETTER-FORM MOTION by De'Maurea Davis (pro se) for an extension of time to pay filing fee. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley. (tmr) |
| Filing 3 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley for Findings of Fact and Recommendations for disposition. (cc: counsel of record and any pro se party) (klc) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE to Petitioner of Failure to Remit Filing Fee. (jsa) |
| CASE assigned to Judge Joseph R. Goodwin. (klc) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS by De'Maurea Davis against Warden pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 2241. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) (jsa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
