Southern District of West Virginia Cases

Cases filed

Cases 1 - 10 of 93,439
Oster v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv06667
Plaintiff: Robin Oster
Defendant: C. R. Bard, Inc., Sofradim Production SAS, Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Product Liability
Hartweck v. Ethicon, Inc.
as 2:2015cv06803
Plaintiff: Sharon Hartweck
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Civil Shell Case Opening
Legue v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv06802
Plaintiff: Eileen Legue
Defendant: Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: Civil Shell Case Opening
Mitzel v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2015cv06658
Plaintiff: Jessica Mitzel
Defendant: C. R. Bard, Inc., Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Product Liability
Morning v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv06659
Plaintiff: Barbara D. Morning
Defendant: C. R. Bard, Inc., Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Product Liability
Murphy-Haynes v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv06660
Plaintiff: Barbara E. Murphy-Haynes
Defendant: C. R. Bard, Inc., Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Product Liability
Nagel v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv06661
Plaintiff: Jeannine L. Nagel
Defendant: C. R. Bard, Inc., Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Product Liability
Neuner v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv06662
Plaintiff: Diana Neuner
Defendant: C. R. Bard, Inc., Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Product Liability
Norman v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv06663
Plaintiff: Patricia A. Norman
Defendant: C. R. Bard, Inc., Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Product Liability
O'Meara v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv06664
Plaintiff: Magdalen M. O'Meara
Defendant: C. R. Bard, Inc., Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Product Liability
1 2 3 4 5 Next

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.