US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 4,660
Coleman v. Holpzapfell
as 5:2024cv00229
Petitioner:
Stye Lamar Coleman
Respondent:
Holpzapfell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Tolliver v. Barker et al.
as 1:2024cv00231
Plaintiff:
Hiram Tolliver
Defendant:
D. R. Barker, K. L. Ross, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Compton v. Conner et al
as 5:2024cv00230
Plaintiff:
Rodney C. Compton
Defendant:
J. Conner, A. Ross and FCI-Beckley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Hernandez v. Rokosky
as 1:2024cv00225
Plaintiff:
Marco Hernandez
Defendant:
E. Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Harris v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 5:2024cv00223
Petitioner:
Anthony Harris
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Diego v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00219
Petitioner:
Donnell Dwayne Diego
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Harris v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 5:2024cv00213
Petitioner:
Anthony Harris
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
Lindsey v. Cutright
as 1:2024cv00205
Petitioner:
Shaun Lindsey
Respondent:
C. Cutright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00201
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Brown v. Fayette County, West Virginia Prosecuting Attorney
as 2:2024cv00200
Plaintiff:
Robert I. Brown, Jr.
Defendant:
Fayette County, West Virginia Prosecuting Attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
