Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Gravlee v. Tibbs et al
as 5:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
John Christian Gravlee
Defendant:
FNU Tibbs, FNU Prince, FNU Kala and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Crawford v. Lawson et al
as 5:2023cv00668
Plaintiff:
Bernard Crawford
Defendant:
Regina Lawson, Steven Bickley, T Hastings Siegfried and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00259
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Rodriguez v. Goldey et al
as 5:2022cv00921
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Rodriguez
Defendant:
Warden Goldey, Associate Warden Michelli, Captain Bouche and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stouffer v. Crow et al
as 5:2021cv01000
Plaintiff:
Bigler Jobe Stouffer, II and Bigler Jobe Stouffer
Defendant:
Scott Crow, Randy Chandler, Betty R Gesell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prince v. United States of America
as 5:2020cv00342
Petitioner:
Alfred James Prince
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jackson v. Probation and Community et al
as 5:2018cv01187
Plaintiff:
Prince Edward Jackson and Brian Craig Herd
Defendant:
Sara Faye Inight, FNU Society, Marcus Berry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prince v. Bryant et al
as 6:2018cv00201
Defendant:
Milton Anthony, Kimberly Miller, Chester Carter and others
Plaintiff:
Judy Lynn Prince
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prince v. City of Tulsa et al
as 4:2018cv00282
Plaintiff:
Wesley Prince
Defendant:
City of Tulsa , Stephen Tidwell, Turn Key Health Clinics, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Barron v. United States of America et al
as 6:2017cv00412
Plaintiff:
Ricky Dale Barron
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Forest Service, Timothy Fincham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
