Cases 1 - 10 of 150
Tyrrell et al v. Nagy et al
as 2:2024cv10250
Plaintiff:
Anthony David Thomas, Steven Sanchez, John Warren Ross and others
Defendant:
Richard Lee Robinson, William Charles Valkema, Creston Jerome Hicks and others
Petitioner:
Bobbie Maxwell, Benjamin Ballge, Richard Schall and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv10147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Giles v. Garland et al
as 1:2024cv10138
Plaintiff:
Kevin La'von Giles
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Dawn Ison, Diane N. Princ and others
Prince v. State of Michigan
as 2:2023cv12226
Plaintiff:
Gerald Amos Prince, Jr.
Defendant:
State of Michigan
Giles v. US Attorney General et al
as 2:2023cv11828
Plaintiff:
Kevin L. Giles
Defendant:
US Attorney General, Dawn N. Ison, Sara D. Woodward and others
Sigourney v. Danielson et al
as 1:2023cv00613
Plaintiff:
John Leroy Sigourney, Sr. and John Leroy Sigourney, Jr.
Defendant:
Mark Danielson, Unknown Harwood, Unknown Prince and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ADAC Plastics, Inc. v. Prince
as 1:2023cv00552
Counter Defendant:
ADAC Plastics, Inc.
Counter Claimant:
Jack Prince
Plaintiff:
ADAC Plastics, Inc. a Michigan corporation doing business as ADAC Automotive
Not Classified By Court:
Facilitative Mediator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Prince v. Farris et al
as 5:2023cv10405
Plaintiff:
Timothy Prince
Defendant:
Farris, Simmit, Pary and others
Laws v. Michigan, State of et al
as 1:2023cv00102
Plaintiff:
Addis Adam Laws, Jr.
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Division of Child Support Services, Kent, County of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Sorezo v. Buckingham Palace et al
as 1:2022cv12540
Plaintiff:
Garrett MJ Talif Sorezo
Defendant:
Buckingham Palace, Prince William, Prince Harry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
